{relative link to description of changes} (optional)
category
{category} (only for first release)
title
{title} (only for first release)
introduction
{intro} (only for first release)
ci-build
{link to ci-build location} (only for first release) -- http://build.fhir.org/ig/IHE/Profile
RelatedIgs
(None Found)
This IG has never been published
This appears to be the first publication, so first must be true
Publication Request is for '{pid} -- ihe.domain.profile' but package is nhs.england.rad
Publication Request is for v'{version to release}' but package version is v0.0.1-current
Proposed path for this publication does not start with the canonical URL ({path} -- https://profiles.ihe.net/Domain/Profile/1.0.0 vs https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD)
Proposed path for this milestone publication should usually be canonical with either sequence or version appended
This release is labelled as a milestone, so should not have a patch version (0.0.1-current)
This IG is not yet published at all, so there must be "first" : true in the publication request
Unable to compare with previous version: Unable to find version history at https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD (Problem #1 with package-list.json at https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD: Not Found)
IPA Comparison:
n/a
IPS Comparison:
n/a
Validation Flags:
On: autoLoad; Off: hintAboutNonMustSupport, anyExtensionsAllowed, checkAggregation, showReferenceMessages, noExperimentalContent, displayWarnings
The canonical URL for an Implementation Guide must point directly to the implementation guide resource, not to the Implementation Guide as a whole
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource List/ListExample. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource DiagnosticReport/DiagnosticReportImagingReportRCR. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource DiagnosticReport/DiagnosticReportImagingReportNRL. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
The link 'StructureDefinition-practitioner-identifier.html' for "PractitionerIdentifier" cannot be resolved
1
warning
The HTML fragment 'ip-statements.xhtml' is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
2
warning
An HTML fragment from the set [cross-version-analysis.xhtml, cross-version-analysis-inline.xhtml] is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
4
warning
The HTML fragment 'globals-table.xhtml' is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
IG
warning
The IG is not for the international realm, and it uses SNOMED CT, so it should fix the SCT edition in the expansion parameters
ActorDefinition/DirectoryService: ActorDefinition: Validated against fhir.ActorDefinition
Path
Severity
Message
ActorDefinition.jurisdiction[0] (l1/c1702)
information
Reference to deprecated ValueSet http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/ValueSet/jurisdiction|5.0.0 (from http://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log) MSG_DEPRECATED
ActorDefinition (l1/c2045)
warning
Constraint failed: cnl-0: 'Name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation' (defined in http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ActorDefinition)http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ActorDefinition#cnl-0
ActorDefinition/DocumentRegistry: ActorDefinition: Validated against fhir.ActorDefinition
Path
Severity
Message
ActorDefinition.jurisdiction[0] (l1/c2022)
information
Reference to deprecated ValueSet http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/ValueSet/jurisdiction|5.0.0 (from http://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log) MSG_DEPRECATED
ActorDefinition (l1/c2353)
warning
Constraint failed: cnl-0: 'Name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation' (defined in http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ActorDefinition)http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ActorDefinition#cnl-0
ActorDefinition/DocumentRepository: ActorDefinition: Validated against fhir.ActorDefinition
Path
Severity
Message
ActorDefinition.jurisdiction[0] (l1/c1654)
information
Reference to deprecated ValueSet http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/ValueSet/jurisdiction|5.0.0 (from http://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log) MSG_DEPRECATED
ActorDefinition (l1/c1985)
warning
Constraint failed: cnl-0: 'Name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation' (defined in http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ActorDefinition)http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ActorDefinition#cnl-0
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)Terminology_TX_NoValid_3_CC
The Coding provided (http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad) was not found in the value set 'DocumentReference Format Code Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1), and a code is recommended to come from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad: 'Radiology Domain'' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1')Terminology_TX_NoValid_14
Unable to resolve resource with reference 'https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/DocumentReference/DocumentReferenceImagingReportIHE'Reference_REF_CantResolve
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)Terminology_TX_NoValid_3_CC
The Coding provided (http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad) was not found in the value set 'DocumentReference Format Code Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1), and a code is recommended to come from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad: 'Radiology Domain'' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1')Terminology_TX_NoValid_14
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)Terminology_TX_NoValid_3_CC
The Coding provided (http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad) was not found in the value set 'DocumentReference Format Code Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1), and a code is recommended to come from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad: 'Radiology Domain'' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1')Terminology_TX_NoValid_14
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'LOINC Diagnostic Report Codes' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/report-codes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#371525003)Terminology_TX_NoValid_3_CC
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR)Terminology_TX_NoValid_3_CC
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)Terminology_TX_NoValid_3_CC
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR)Terminology_TX_NoValid_3_CC
value should not start or finish with whitespace ' FindAndRetrieveImagingReports'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
CapabilityStatement (l1/c9673)
warning
Constraint failed: cpb-0: 'Name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/CapabilityStatement#cpb-0
CapabilityStatement.text.div
error
Hyperlink 'subdomain-audits.html' at 'div/div/div/blockquote/div/p/a' for 'ATNA/NHS England Audits' does not resolve
CapabilityStatement.text.div
error
Hyperlink 'DiagnosticReport-DiagnosticReportRadiologyRCR.html' at 'div/div/div/div/div/div/blockquote/div/ul/li/a' for 'Imaging Report - Royal College of Radiologist' does not resolve
CapabilityStatement.text.div
error
Hyperlink 'DiagnosticReport-DiagnosticReportRadiologyPlatforms.html' at 'div/div/div/div/div/div/blockquote/div/ul/li/a' for 'Imaging Report - NHS England Alpha Specification' does not resolve
Hyperlink 'subdomain-audits.html' at 'div/div/div/blockquote/div/p/a' for 'ATNA/NHS England Audits' does not resolve
CapabilityStatement.text.div
error
Hyperlink 'DocumentReference-DocumentReferenceRadiologyIHE.html' at 'div/div/div/div/div/div/blockquote/div/ul/li/a' for 'DocumentReference IHE for Radiology' does not resolve
Hyperlink 'DocumentReference-DocumentReferenceRadiologyNRL.html' at 'div/div/div/div/div/div/blockquote/div/ul/li/a' for 'DocumentReference NRL for Radiology' does not resolve
Coding has no system. A code with no system has no defined meaning, and it cannot be validated. A system should be provided
DiagnosticReport.code (l38/c4)
information
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'LOINC Diagnostic Report Codes' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/report-codes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#371525003)Terminology_TX_NoValid_3_CC
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (1) for slice [type] in profile DiagnosticReport.performer:organisation - the discriminator https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/ImagingReport|0.0.1-current does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertionsSLICING_CANNOT_BE_EVALUATED
DiagnosticReport.performer[0] (l94/c6)
error
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (1) for slice [type] in profile DiagnosticReport.performer:operator - the discriminator https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/ImagingReport|0.0.1-current does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertionsSLICING_CANNOT_BE_EVALUATED
DiagnosticReport.resultsInterpreter[0] (l38/c6)
error
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Invalid function name null() in discriminatorSLICING_CANNOT_BE_EVALUATED
DiagnosticReport (l1/c2)
information
DiagnosticReport.performer:organisation: Found 0 matches, but unable to check minimum required (DiagnosticReport.performer) due to lack of slicing validation (from https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/ImagingReport|0.0.1-current)Validation_VAL_Profile_NoCheckMin
DiagnosticReport.code.coding[0] (l78/c4)
warning
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://nicip.nhs.uk' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated
DiagnosticReport.resultsInterpreter[0] (l38/c6)
error
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction is not allowed to be used at this point (allowed = e:Observation.performer, e:DiagnosticReport.performer, e:DocumentReference.author, e:Consent.grantee; this element is [DiagnosticReport.resultsInterpreter, Reference])Extension_EXTP_Context_Wrong
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/DocumentEntry|0.0.1-current (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/DocumentEntry|0.0.1-current (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
DocumentReference.identifier[0]: discriminator = true and use.where(value = 'official').exists()
Details_for__matching_against_Profile_
DocumentReference.status (l79/c22)
information
Reference to draft CodeSystem http://hl7.org/fhir/document-reference-status|4.0.1MSG_DRAFT
DocumentReference.type.coding[0] (l80/c4)
warning
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://nicip.nhs.uk' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated
DocumentReference.type (l80/c4)
error
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
DocumentReference.category[0] (l104/c6)
error
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Class' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-class|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#4201000179104)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Facility Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/facility-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = null#E02)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Specialty' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/specialty|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://fhir.hl7.org.uk/CodeSystem/UKCore-PracticeSettingCode#810)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/DocumentEntry|0.0.1-current (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/DocumentEntry|0.0.1-current (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
DocumentReference.identifier[0]: discriminator = true and use.where(value = 'official').exists()
Details_for__matching_against_Profile_
DocumentReference.status (l79/c22)
information
Reference to draft CodeSystem http://hl7.org/fhir/document-reference-status|4.0.1MSG_DRAFT
DocumentReference.type.coding[0] (l80/c4)
warning
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://nicip.nhs.uk' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated
DocumentReference.type (l80/c4)
error
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
DocumentReference.category[0] (l104/c6)
error
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Class' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-class|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#721981007)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Facility Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/facility-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = null#E02)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Specialty' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/specialty|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://fhir.hl7.org.uk/CodeSystem/UKCore-PracticeSettingCode#810)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/DocumentReferenceMinimalDocumentMetadata|0.0.1-current (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/DocumentReferenceMinimalDocumentMetadata|0.0.1-current (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
DocumentReference.identifier[0]: discriminator = true and use.where(value = 'official').exists()
Details_for__matching_against_Profile_
DocumentReference.status (l73/c22)
information
Reference to draft CodeSystem http://hl7.org/fhir/document-reference-status|4.0.1MSG_DRAFT
DocumentReference.type.coding[0] (l74/c4)
warning
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://nicip.nhs.uk' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated
DocumentReference.type (l74/c4)
error
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
DocumentReference.category[0] (l98/c6)
error
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Class' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-class|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#721981007)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Facility Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/facility-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = null#E02)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Specialty' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/specialty|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://fhir.hl7.org.uk/CodeSystem/UKCore-PracticeSettingCode#810)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)Validation_VAL_Profile_Minimum
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)Validation_VAL_Profile_Minimum
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)Validation_VAL_Profile_Minimum
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)Validation_VAL_Profile_Minimum
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)Validation_VAL_Profile_Minimum
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)Validation_VAL_Profile_Minimum
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)Validation_VAL_Profile_Minimum
The value provided ('excludejsn') was not found in the value set 'ig-parameters Codes ValueSet' (http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0), and a code is required from this value set (error message = The System URI could not be determined for the code 'excludejsn' in the ValueSet 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0'; The provided code '#excludejsn' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0')Terminology_TX_NoValid_16
The value provided ('excludeexample') was not found in the value set 'ig-parameters Codes ValueSet' (http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0), and a code is required from this value set (error message = The System URI could not be determined for the code 'excludeexample' in the ValueSet 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0'; The provided code '#excludeexample' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0')Terminology_TX_NoValid_16
The value provided ('excludejsn') was not found in the value set 'ig-parameters Codes ValueSet' (http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0), and a code is required from this value set (error message = The System URI could not be determined for the code 'excludejsn' in the ValueSet 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0'; The provided code '#excludejsn' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0')Terminology_TX_NoValid_16
The value provided ('excludeexample') was not found in the value set 'ig-parameters Codes ValueSet' (http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0), and a code is required from this value set (error message = The System URI could not be determined for the code 'excludeexample' in the ValueSet 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0'; The provided code '#excludeexample' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0')Terminology_TX_NoValid_16
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nSee [IHE MHD Minimal DocumentReference](https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/MHD/StructureDefinition/IHE.MHD.Minimal.DocumentReference)\n\nDocumentation only at present - is not currently required in the project.'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
Unable to resolve resource with reference 'https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/DocumentReference/DocumentReferenceImagingReportIHE'Reference_REF_CantResolve
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0, 2018-08-12, 3.0.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0, 2018-08-12, 3.0.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator path 'extension[performerFunction].valueCodeableConcept.coding.code' does not appear to be valid for the element that is being sliced 'DiagnosticReport.resultsInterpreter': Error evaluating FHIRPath expression: The name 'performerFunction' is not valid for any of the possible types: [http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Reference] (@char 1)SD_PATH_ERROR
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The definition for the element 'ImagingStudy.series.performer.function' binds to the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/series-performer-function' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimentalSD_ED_EXPERIMENTAL_BINDING
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0, 2018-08-12, 3.0.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0, 2014-03-26, 3.0.0TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.experimental is mandatory, but it is not present
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.experimental is mandatory, but it is not present
The value for a filter based on property 'concept' must be a valid code from the system 'http://snomed.info/sct', and 'childOf 4201000179104' is not (Unknown code 'childOf 4201000179104' in the CodeSystem 'http://snomed.info/sct' version 'http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201')VALUESET_BAD_FILTER_VALUE_VALID_CODE
ValueSet (l1/c1435)
warning
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.experimental is mandatory, but it is not present
Error from http://tx.fhir.org/r4: The filter "concept is-a childOf 4201000179104" from the value set https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-type-imaging-report-report was not understood in the context of http://snomed.info/sct (3) (from server, see log)
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.experimental is mandatory, but it is not present
The value for a filter based on property 'concept' must be a valid code from the system 'http://snomed.info/sct', and 'memberOf 999001111000000105' is not (Unknown code 'memberOf 999001111000000105' in the CodeSystem 'http://snomed.info/sct' version 'http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201')VALUESET_BAD_FILTER_VALUE_VALID_CODE
ValueSet (l1/c1569)
warning
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.experimental is mandatory, but it is not present
ValueSet.where(id = 'imaging-code-nicip')
error
Error from http://tx.fhir.org/r4: The filter "concept is-a memberOf 999001111000000105" from the value set https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/imaging-code-nicip was not understood in the context of http://snomed.info/sct (3) (from server, see log)
The value for a filter based on property 'concept' must be a valid code from the system 'http://snomed.info/sct', and 'childOf 363680008' is not (Unknown code 'childOf 363680008' in the CodeSystem 'http://snomed.info/sct' version 'http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201')VALUESET_BAD_FILTER_VALUE_VALID_CODE
ValueSet (l1/c1262)
warning
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.experimental is mandatory, but it is not present
ValueSet.where(id = 'modality')
error
Error from http://tx.fhir.org/r4: The filter "concept is-a childOf 363680008" from the value set https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/modality was not understood in the context of http://snomed.info/sct (3) (from server, see log)
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.experimental is mandatory, but it is not present
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.experimental is mandatory, but it is not present
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.experimental is mandatory, but it is not present
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/DocumentEntry|0.0.1-current (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/DocumentEntry|0.0.1-current (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/DocumentReferenceMinimalDocumentMetadata|0.0.1-current (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction is not allowed to be used at this point (allowed = e:Observation.performer, e:DiagnosticReport.performer, e:DocumentReference.author, e:Consent.grantee; this element is [DiagnosticReport.resultsInterpreter, Reference])
The definition for the element 'ImagingStudy.series.performer.function' binds to the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/series-performer-function' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental
The discriminator path 'extension[performerFunction].valueCodeableConcept.coding.code' does not appear to be valid for the element that is being sliced 'DiagnosticReport.resultsInterpreter': Error evaluating FHIRPath expression: The name 'performerFunction' is not valid for any of the possible types: [http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Reference] (@char 1)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (1) for slice [type] in profile DiagnosticReport.performer:organisation - the discriminator https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/ImagingReport|0.0.1-current does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertions
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (1) for slice [type] in profile DiagnosticReport.performer:operator - the discriminator https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/ImagingReport|0.0.1-current does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertions
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0, 2018-08-12, 3.0.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0, 2018-08-12, 3.0.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/event-performerFunction'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 1.0.0, 4.0.1, 5.1.0, 5.2.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0, 2018-08-12, 3.0.0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer. Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0, 2014-03-26, 3.0.0
The Coding provided (http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad) was not found in the value set 'DocumentReference Format Code Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1), and a code is recommended to come from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad: 'Radiology Domain'' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1')
The Coding provided (http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad) was not found in the value set 'DocumentReference Format Code Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1), and a code is recommended to come from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad: 'Radiology Domain'' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1')
The Coding provided (http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad) was not found in the value set 'DocumentReference Format Code Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1), and a code is recommended to come from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode#urn:ihe:rad: 'Radiology Domain'' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/formatcodes|4.0.1')
The value provided ('excludejsn') was not found in the value set 'ig-parameters Codes ValueSet' (http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0), and a code is required from this value set (error message = The System URI could not be determined for the code 'excludejsn' in the ValueSet 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0'; The provided code '#excludejsn' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0')
The value provided ('excludeexample') was not found in the value set 'ig-parameters Codes ValueSet' (http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0), and a code is required from this value set (error message = The System URI could not be determined for the code 'excludeexample' in the ValueSet 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0'; The provided code '#excludeexample' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0')
The value provided ('excludejsn') was not found in the value set 'ig-parameters Codes ValueSet' (http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0), and a code is required from this value set (error message = The System URI could not be determined for the code 'excludejsn' in the ValueSet 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0'; The provided code '#excludejsn' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0')
The value provided ('excludeexample') was not found in the value set 'ig-parameters Codes ValueSet' (http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0), and a code is required from this value set (error message = The System URI could not be determined for the code 'excludeexample' in the ValueSet 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0'; The provided code '#excludeexample' was not found in the value set 'http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/ValueSet/ig-parameters|0.3.0')
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Class' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-class|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#4201000179104)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Facility Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/facility-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = null#E02)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Specialty' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/specialty|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://fhir.hl7.org.uk/CodeSystem/UKCore-PracticeSettingCode#810)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Class' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-class|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#721981007)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Facility Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/facility-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = null#E02)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Specialty' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/specialty|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://fhir.hl7.org.uk/CodeSystem/UKCore-PracticeSettingCode#810)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Entry Class' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/document-entry-class|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#721981007)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Facility Type' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/facility-type|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = null#E02)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Specialty' (https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/ValueSet/specialty|0.0.1-current), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = https://fhir.hl7.org.uk/CodeSystem/UKCore-PracticeSettingCode#810)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR, http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'LOINC Diagnostic Report Codes' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/report-codes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#371525003)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#418062002)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Document Type Value Set' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/c80-doc-typecodes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = https://nicip.nhs.uk#MAULR)
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'LOINC Diagnostic Report Codes' (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/report-codes|4.0.1), and a coding is recommended to come from this value set (codes = http://snomed.info/sct#371525003)
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nSee [IHE MHD Minimal DocumentReference](https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/MHD/StructureDefinition/IHE.MHD.Minimal.DocumentReference)\n\nDocumentation only at present - is not currently required in the project.'
The value for a filter based on property 'concept' must be a valid code from the system 'http://snomed.info/sct', and 'childOf 4201000179104' is not (Unknown code 'childOf 4201000179104' in the CodeSystem 'http://snomed.info/sct' version 'http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201')
The value for a filter based on property 'concept' must be a valid code from the system 'http://snomed.info/sct', and 'memberOf 999001111000000105' is not (Unknown code 'memberOf 999001111000000105' in the CodeSystem 'http://snomed.info/sct' version 'http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201')
The value for a filter based on property 'concept' must be a valid code from the system 'http://snomed.info/sct', and 'childOf 363680008' is not (Unknown code 'childOf 363680008' in the CodeSystem 'http://snomed.info/sct' version 'http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201')
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)
ExampleScenario.instance.version.description: minimum required = 1, but only found 0 (from http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ExampleScenario|4.0.1)
DiagnosticReport.performer:organisation: Found 0 matches, but unable to check minimum required (DiagnosticReport.performer) due to lack of slicing validation (from https://fhir.nhs.uk/England/RAD/StructureDefinition/ImagingReport|0.0.1-current)
nhs.england.rad
ihe.iti.balp